Judge Aileen Cannon”s decision to kick the can down the road when it comes to ruling on the constitutionality of prosecuting Donald Trump for obstructing justice when he refused to return sensitive government documents was blasted by one former U.S. attorney who mocked her written justification. On her Civil Discourse platform, former prosecutor Joyce Vance took aim at Judge Cannon’s ruling for its impenetrable legal prose, including sentences such as, “The overall question presented depends too greatly on contested instructional questions about still-fluctuating definitions of statutory term…