The United States Supreme Court on Friday ruled in an 8-1 vote that the government had the right to restrict access to firearms for alleged domestic abusers. However, there was one notable dissent in the ruling: Justice Clarence Thomas. As flagged by Slate’s Mark Joseph Stern, Thomas argued that all regulations of firearms should be deemed in violation of the Second Amendment “unless it is consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.” Want more breaking political news? Click for the latest headlines at Raw Story. Thomas then claimed that there is “not a single histo…