Political and scientific news at the moment can seem like they are coming from parallel worlds. On the one hand science reporting is full of coverage of the – mostly disastrous – consequences of a hotter world. What gets published to a non-scientific audience is a tiny fraction of the research reaching the same conclusions. Meanwhile these same issues are barely featuring in a furiously contested US election. There’s only so much one outlet can do to change this, but IFLScience decided it was time to try to bring these worlds together by asking where the candidates stand on climate-related iss…