Many MAGA Republicans and supporters of the Federalist Society have praised the Roberts Court for their emphasis on “originalism” or “textualism.” But law professor and former federal prosecutor Kimberly Wehle is vehemently disdainful of that claim in an op-ed published by The Hill on July 2, arguing that the High Court’s controversial 6-3 presidential immunity ruling in Trump v. the United States exposes “originalism” or “textualism” as a “ruse.” The Court’s GOP-appointed justices, Wehle notes, “purport to follow a constrained approach to the Constitution” — adding that the Trump v. the Unite…