A Boston University law professor who admitted that he was skeptical prosecutors from Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office could bring their case against Donald Trump stated that a tactical change near the end of the trial sealed the deal with the jury. In a column for Slate, legal expert Jed Shugerman started by stating he had been a “vocal critic” of the way the charges had initially been presented as part of the . He was concerned about the prosecution relying on 34 internal documents that the public had no knowledge, he wrote, and how the lawyers would show they’d been used to …