M. Patchett’s climate letter is a classic bouquet of half-truth nonsense. He does us no favours. False reassurance got us into the pickle we are in. There are just too many falsehoods to point to, so here is just one example: He poo-poos climate models as unreliable. Yet, a study found that climate models — even those published back in the 1970s — did remarkably well at prediction, with 14 out of the 17 projections statistically indistinguishable from what actually occurred (https://www.real climate.org/index.php/ archives/2019/12/how-good-have-climate-models-been-at-truly-predicting-the-futur…